Next: Properties of Continuous Functions
Up: Continuous Functions
Previous: The Concept
  Contents
Remark 3.2.1 (Convergence of Sequences)
The definition of continuity greatly increases our calculation power. Because, if we
know a function to be continuous, we can use it in the calculation of limits.
An obvious example is
 |
(3.2.1) |
where the continuity of the

function allows us to bring the limit inside.
A more involved example is the calculation of
 |
(3.2.2) |
Using the fact that

is a continuous function over

yields the following
result:
 |
(3.2.3) |
Finally, if

of a sequence goes to

, then this sequence goes to 0.
Therefore
 |
(3.2.4) |
Examples 3.2.2 (Limits for

)
With the long list of continuous functions at our disposal, we now have
the ability to calculate about every limit that crosses our path.
Look e.g. at
 |
(3.2.5) |
As this function is continuous at

(or at every point except

for that matter), we can take the limit inside and we obtain:
 |
(3.2.6) |
Still, there are a couple standard tricks around that have no grand theoretical
basis but are used over and over again.
In rational functions, one often encounters

, which is
undefined. Often, eliminating common factors in numerator and denominator
solve the problem:
Sometimes (especially when roots are involved), it might not be so clear
that there is a common factor. In this case, try to multiply numerator
and denominator with a conjugated term, e.g. :
When dealing with limits of trigonometric functions, it often simply pays
off to know a bunch of trig identities:
 |
(3.2.9) |
A handy formula to remember is
 |
(3.2.10) |
This limit is easy to prove using de l'Hôpital's rule
(
4.2.7), but the elementary geometric proof is a real
pain in the neck, so we'll skip it for now and forever. The
corresponding identity for the cosine function is easily proven
using (
3.2.10):
Examples 3.2.3 (Limits for

)
The tricks that apply for limits going to a point also apply for limits going to
infinity, yet there are some peculiarities that are almost unavoidable.
The most common one is dividing the numerator and the denominator in a
rational function by the highest order term:
Note that the limit equals the coefficient of the highest order term
in the numerator divided by the coefficient of the highest order term
in the denominator. Now, do
not memorise this rule. If you start
going down that road, you will have a lot of similar looking rules to
memorise and your brain, being as unreliable as a human brain invariably
is, will start mixing them up. As long as you understand the above
calculation, you can reproduce it easily in any similar situation.
Another typical problem is calculating a limit like
 |
(3.2.13) |
The problem is that although

tails of to 0 quit fast, the limit
cannot be calculated by simply taking the product of the

limits as
the limit for

going to infinity of the sine function is undefined.
A way around is is to invoke the squeeze lemma (
2.0.17) and
notice the following:
 |
(3.2.14) |
So

. A little more involved is
the calculation of the following limit:
 |
(3.2.15) |
It can be calculated by noticing that

for
any

, in fact for large

the difference is quite substantial. Then we have
This limit will also turn out to be an easy prey for de l'Hôpital's rule
(
4.2.7).
Next: Properties of Continuous Functions
Up: Continuous Functions
Previous: The Concept
  Contents
Marc Corluy
2003-08-26